Re: upgrade to 7.2 & pgdumpall - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: upgrade to 7.2 & pgdumpall
Date
Msg-id 116.1014217005@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: upgrade to 7.2 & pgdumpall  ("Ben-Nes Michael" <miki@canaan.co.il>)
List pgsql-general
"Ben-Nes Michael" <miki@canaan.co.il> writes:
> But still if it was legal relation in 7.1.3 why its not legal in 7.2 ?

pgadmin is making assumptions about the system catalog contents that
aren't true anymore in 7.2.  Thus its views on the catalogs break.

> Does pgadmin II install relations of its own in the DB too ?

I think they're views, not tables.  Still, I agree that there's no
really good reason to have them.  As for whether pgadmin II is less
intrusive, you'll have to go ask its developers.

            regards, tom lane

pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Thomas Lockhart
Date:
Subject: Re: pg_statistics
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Install postmaster as service in win2K