Re: Generic Monitoring Framework Proposal - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Simon Riggs
Subject Re: Generic Monitoring Framework Proposal
Date
Msg-id 1150794402.2587.146.camel@localhost.localdomain
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Generic Monitoring Framework Proposal  (Theo Schlossnagle <jesus@omniti.com>)
Responses Re: Generic Monitoring Framework Proposal
List pgsql-hackers
On Mon, 2006-06-19 at 19:36 -0400, Theo Schlossnagle wrote:

> The idea of having intelligently placed dtrace probes in Postrgres  
> would allow us
...
>  to troubleshoot[ing] obtuse production  
> problems.  That, to me, is exciting stuff.
[paraphrased by SR]

I very much agree with the requirement here.

This needs to work on Linux and Windows, minimum, also.

It's obviously impossible to move a production system to a different OS
just to use a cool tracing tool. So the architecture must intelligently
handle the needs of multiple OS - even if the underlying facilities on
them do not yet provide what we'd like. So I'm OK with Solaris being the
best, just as long as its not the only one that benefits.

--  Simon Riggs EnterpriseDB          http://www.enterprisedb.com



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Simon Riggs
Date:
Subject: Re: shall we have a TRACE_MEMORY mode
Next
From: "Zeugswetter Andreas DCP SD"
Date:
Subject: Re: sync_file_range()