Simon Riggs wrote:
>This needs to work on Linux and Windows, minimum, also.
>
>
The proposed solution will work on Linux & Windows if they similar
facility that the macros can map to. Otherwise, the macros stay as
no-ops and will not affect those platforms at all.
>It's obviously impossible to move a production system to a different OS
>just to use a cool tracing tool. So the architecture must intelligently
>handle the needs of multiple OS - even if the underlying facilities on
>them do not yet provide what we'd like. So I'm OK with Solaris being the
>best, just as long as its not the only one that benefits.
>
>
>
The way it's proposed now, any OS can use the same interfaces and map to
their underlying facilities. Does it look reasonable?
Regards,
Robert
