Re: Is PostgreSQL an easy choice for a large CMS? - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Scott Marlowe
Subject Re: Is PostgreSQL an easy choice for a large CMS?
Date
Msg-id 1146501750.22037.14.camel@state.g2switchworks.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Is PostgreSQL an easy choice for a large CMS?  ("Tony Lausin" <tonylausin@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: Is PostgreSQL an easy choice for a large CMS?
List pgsql-general
On Sun, 2006-04-30 at 14:32, Tony Lausin wrote:
> > [ rotfl... ]  MySQL will fall over under any heavy concurrent-write
> > scenario.  It's conceivable that PG won't do what you need either,
> > but if not I'm afraid you're going to be forced into Oracle or one
> > of the other serious-money DBs.
> >
> >                         regards, tom lane
>
> Hi Tom,
>
> That's a scary idea - being forced into Oracle or Sybase. Isn't
> Slashdot.org still running strongly off of MySQL?

Depends on how you define strongly.  Slashdot has a LOT of code in place
to cache the content so it never has to hit the database directly.
Basically, every X seconds, the data creating the site is ripped outta
the database and produced as static content so that the writes and reads
don't clobber each other.  And it still takes a pretty big and fast
machine to handle the load.

pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: "Tony Lausin"
Date:
Subject: Re: Is PostgreSQL an easy choice for a large CMS?
Next
From: "Guy Rouillier"
Date:
Subject: Re: How would I write this query...