Re: Is PostgreSQL an easy choice for a large CMS? - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Tony Lausin
Subject Re: Is PostgreSQL an easy choice for a large CMS?
Date
Msg-id 296cdcaf0604301232o109a6e6p89a168200385e04a@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Is PostgreSQL an easy choice for a large CMS?  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: Is PostgreSQL an easy choice for a large CMS?  ("Matthew T. O'Connor" <matthew@zeut.net>)
Re: Is PostgreSQL an easy choice for a large CMS?  (Scott Marlowe <smarlowe@g2switchworks.com>)
Re: Is PostgreSQL an easy choice for a large CMS?  ("Jim C. Nasby" <jnasby@pervasive.com>)
List pgsql-general
> [ rotfl... ]  MySQL will fall over under any heavy concurrent-write
> scenario.  It's conceivable that PG won't do what you need either,
> but if not I'm afraid you're going to be forced into Oracle or one
> of the other serious-money DBs.
>
>                         regards, tom lane

Hi Tom,

That's a scary idea - being forced into Oracle or Sybase. Isn't
Slashdot.org still running strongly off of MySQL?

Regards,

Anthony

pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Operator Class for Hash
Next
From: "Tony Lausin"
Date:
Subject: Re: Is PostgreSQL an easy choice for a large CMS?