Re: Is PostgreSQL an easy choice for a large CMS? - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Tony Lausin
Subject Re: Is PostgreSQL an easy choice for a large CMS?
Date
Msg-id 296cdcaf0604301214t17c4bb49x20f9a6c25d740b8d@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Is PostgreSQL an easy choice for a large CMS?  (David Goodenough <david.goodenough@btconnect.com>)
List pgsql-general
> Very odd.  I had always heard that MySql (at least originally) was a
> "quick and dirty" database, easy to use, not fully standards compliant,
> and not enterprise grade.  Postgresql on the other hand was always
> the heavyweight, standards compliant, enterprise db, which was more
> difficult to use and set up but much more resilient.  Postgresql has been
> getting more UI support (often seen as a user friendly bonus) and
> things like autovacuum support so that it is easier to use out of the box,
> and MySql has been gaining standards compliance and resilience.
>
> Funny how perceptions can differ.

Hi David,

I think it's very odd too, cause that's the exact same perception of
MySQL I have. My experience with MySQL is really limited to my
Wordpress blog, and that means I've never actually designed a database
with it. I wonder how much of this is just marketing and hype - either
on the side of MySQL or the side of Oracle.

pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: "Tony Lausin"
Date:
Subject: Re: Is PostgreSQL an easy choice for a large CMS?
Next
From: "Tony Lausin"
Date:
Subject: Re: Is PostgreSQL an easy choice for a large CMS?