PostgreSQL-9.0alpha: jade required? - Mailing list pgsql-bugs

From Lou Picciano
Subject PostgreSQL-9.0alpha: jade required?
Date
Msg-id 1138170319.8557671267026679670.JavaMail.root@sz0093a.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net
Whole thread Raw
Responses Re: PostgreSQL-9.0alpha: jade required?  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-bugs
Not sure it's exactly a bug, but in attempting a compile of PostgreSQL-9.0alpha, we are getting a choke on jade (don't
havejade on this system)  


Can the config script test for jade or, better yet, allow an option to turn off build of documentation?

pgsql-bugs by date:

Previous
From: "Patrick Weimer"
Date:
Subject: Could not receive data from client: Unknown winsock error 10061
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: BUG #5338: PG_DUMP fails due to invalid adnum value