Re: State of Beta 2 - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: State of Beta 2
Date
Msg-id 11353.1063555858@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: State of Beta 2  (Network Administrator <netadmin@vcsn.com>)
Responses Re: State of Beta 2  (Network Administrator <netadmin@vcsn.com>)
List pgsql-general
Network Administrator <netadmin@vcsn.com> writes:
> The abstraction I am talking about would be a logical layer that would handle
> disk I/O including the format of that data (lets call this the ADH).

This sounds good in the abstract, but I don't see how you would define
such a layer in a way that was both thin and able to cope with large
changes in representation.  In a very real sense, "handle disk I/O
including the format of the data" describes the entire backend.  To
create an abstraction layer that will actually give any traction for
maintenance, you'd have to find a way to slice it much more narrowly
than that.

Even if the approach can be made to work, defining such a layer and then
revising all the existing code to go through it would be a huge amount
of work.

Ultimately there's no substitute for hard work :-(

            regards, tom lane

pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Lincoln Yeoh
Date:
Subject: Re: need for in-place upgrades (was Re: State of
Next
From: Jeff Eckermann
Date:
Subject: Re: Create index in PG table with vb6