Re: Latin vs non-Latin words in text search parsing - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: Latin vs non-Latin words in text search parsing
Date
Msg-id 11225.1193150958@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Latin vs non-Latin words in text search parsing  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
I wrote:
> (As an example, "foo-beta1" is a numhword, with component tokens
> "foo" an aword and "beta1" a numword.  This is how it works now
> modulo the redefinition of the base categories.)

Argh... need more caffeine.  Obviously the component tokens would
be apart_hword and numpart_hword.  They'd be the others only if
they were *not* part of a hyphenated word.
        regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Latin vs non-Latin words in text search parsing
Next
From: Michael Glaesemann
Date:
Subject: Re: Latin vs non-Latin words in text search parsing