On Wed, 2005-04-27 at 15:43, Typing80wpm@aol.com wrote:
> I am just beginning to teach myself Postgresql and Access. I notice
> that PG has the "serial" type of field which increments
> automatically. I notice that when I do external links in Access
> through ODBC, that Access wants a field or fields which will be
> unique.
>
> Here is my question. Would I be wise to define each and ever table
> with a serial id, so that I may always be guaranteed something uniqe,
> to satisfy Access. It seems to me like no harm can be done, since if
> you dont need the serial id, you dont need it, but it is always there
> if you do need it, and it is harder to add such a field down the line,
> after the fact.
Since 7.4 or 7.3 (I forget which) serial has NOT guaranteed uniqueness.
you have to add unique or primary key to the declaration like so:
create table foo (bar serial unique, otherfield int);
Or replace "unique" with "primary key"...
