Re: Documentation on PITR still scarce - Mailing list pgsql-hackers
From | Simon Riggs |
---|---|
Subject | Re: Documentation on PITR still scarce |
Date | |
Msg-id | 1101736860.2963.210.camel@localhost.localdomain Whole thread Raw |
In response to | Re: Documentation on PITR still scarce (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>) |
Responses |
Re: Documentation on PITR still scarce
Re: Documentation on PITR still scarce Re: Documentation on PITR still scarce |
List | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, 2004-11-29 at 13:10, Bruce Momjian wrote: > Or TODO maybe worded as: > > * Allow the PITR process to be debugged and data examined > Yes, thats good for me... Greg's additional request might be worded: * Allow a warm standby system to also allow read-only queries Thanks. > --------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Simon Riggs wrote: > > On Mon, 2004-11-29 at 02:20, Bruce Momjian wrote: > > > > > Is this a TODO? > > > > Yes, but don't hold your breath on that feature. > > > > Gavin and I were discussing briefly a design that would allow something > > similar to this. The design would allow the user to stop/start recovery > > and turn a debug trace on/off, in a gdb-like mode. Thats a lot easier to > > implement than the proposal below, which I agree is desirable. We > > haven't hardly started that discussion yet though. > > I called this "recovery console" functionality. > > > > I'm not sure I like the Suspended Animation phrase, I thought maybe > > TARDIS or Langston Field sums it up better (kidding...) > > > > > Greg Stark wrote: > > > > > > > > Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> writes: > > > > > > > > > I suppose it might be useful to have some kind of "suspended animation" > > > > > behavior where you could bring up a backend and look at the database in > > > > > a strict read-only fashion, not really executing transactions at all, > > > > > just to see what you had. Then you could end the recovery and go to > > > > > normal operations, or allow the recovery to proceed further if you > > > > > decided this wasn't where you wanted to be yet. However that would > > > > > require a great deal of mechanism we haven't got (yet). In particular > > > > > there is no such thing as strict read-only examination of the database. > > > > > > > > That would be a great thing to have one day for other reasons aside from the > > > > ability to test out a recovered database. It makes warm standby databases much > > > > more useful. > > > > > > > > A warm standby is when you keep a second machine constantly up to date by > > > > applying the archived PITR logs as soon as they come off your server. You're > > > > ready to switch over at the drop of a hat and don't have to go through the > > > > whole recovery process, you just switch the database from recovery mode to > > > > active mode and make it your primary database. But in the until then the > > > > backup hardware languishes, completely useless. > > > > > > > > Oracle has had a feature for a long time that you can actually open the > > > > standby database in a strict read-only mode and run queries. This is great for > > > > a data warehouse situation where you want to run long batch jobs against > > > > recent data. > > > > > > > > -- Best Regards, Simon Riggs
pgsql-hackers by date: