Re: Point in Time Recovery - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Simon Riggs
Subject Re: Point in Time Recovery
Date
Msg-id 1089935513.17493.6923.camel@stromboli
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Point in Time Recovery  (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@dcc.uchile.cl>)
Responses Re: Point in Time Recovery  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Fri, 2004-07-16 at 00:01, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 15, 2004 at 11:44:02PM +0100, Simon Riggs wrote:
> > On Thu, 2004-07-15 at 13:16, HISADAMasaki wrote:
> 
> > > -- line 236 ---
> > > - pgsignal(SIGCHLD, SIG_IGN);
> > > 
> > > -- line 236 ---
> > > + pgsignal(SIGCHLD, SIG_DFL);
> > 
> > I'm not sure I understand why its returned -1, though I'll take you
> > recommendation. I've not witnessed such an issue. What system are you
> > running, or is it a default shell issue?
> > 
> > Do people think that the change is appropriate for all systems, or just
> > the one you're using?
> 
> My manpage for signal(2) says that you shouldn't assign SIG_IGN to
> SIGCHLD, according to POSIX.  It goes on to say that BSD and SysV
> behaviors differ on this aspect.
> 

POSIX rules OK!

So - I should be setting this to SIG_DFL and thats good for everyone?

OK. Will do.

Best regards, Simon Riggs



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Mark Kirkwood
Date:
Subject: Re: Point in Time Recovery
Next
From: Simon Riggs
Date:
Subject: Re: Point in Time Recovery