On Tue, 2004-04-06 at 04:19, David Costa wrote:
>
> On Apr 6, 2004, at 1:02 AM, scott.marlowe wrote:
>
> >
> > I think that if we are going to benchmark the two, and I'm all for it,
> > we
> > should benchmark them running something fairly standard, like the OSDL
> > tests. And MySQL should be using innodb tables for everything, since
> > postgresql pretty much always carries the load of running mvcc and
> > write
> > ahead logging and transactions for everything it does.
> >
>
> Let's do it ;)
>
One potential problem... I don't think that my$ql can actually handle
the osdl tests. On the bright side iirc the osdl folks switched to
studying postgresql instead of sapdb (aka max$ql) because they could not
get the performance they needed from sapdb, so you might be able to do a
comparison there. But this has always been a problem with benchmarking
my$ql with postgresql... any test complex enough to show off
postgresql's capabilities tends to cause my$ql to fall over... not
saying you shouldn't do it, just saying finding a good benchmark might
be tricky.
BTW David, I'm sure you've seen
http://www.phpbuilder.com/columns/tim20001112.php3?page=1 right?
Robert Treat
--
Build A Brighter Lamp :: Linux Apache {middleware} PostgreSQL
