Re: WIP: extensible enums - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: WIP: extensible enums
Date
Msg-id 10301.1282591239@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: WIP: extensible enums  (Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com>)
Responses Re: WIP: extensible enums
Re: WIP: extensible enums
List pgsql-hackers
Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com> writes:
> I really don't see the value in making a command substantially less
> intuitive in order to avoid a single keyword, unless it affects areas of
> Postgres outside of this particular command.

It's the three variants to do two things that I find unintuitive.

As I mentioned a minute ago, dropping the "abbreviated" syntax and
just having BEFORE and AFTER would be a good way of achieving
symmetry if you find that important.
        regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Alvaro Herrera
Date:
Subject: Re: Return of the Solaris vacuum polling problem -- anyone remember this?
Next
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: Return of the Solaris vacuum polling problem -- anyone remember this?