Re: WIP: extensible enums - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From David E. Wheeler
Subject Re: WIP: extensible enums
Date
Msg-id BDB588B1-4AE2-4DD0-852A-AED8A10E5EA7@kineticode.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: WIP: extensible enums  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: WIP: extensible enums  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Aug 23, 2010, at 12:20 PM, Tom Lane wrote:

> Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com> writes:
>> I really don't see the value in making a command substantially less
>> intuitive in order to avoid a single keyword, unless it affects areas of
>> Postgres outside of this particular command.
> 
> It's the three variants to do two things that I find unintuitive.

I strongly suspect that you are in the minority on this one.

Best,

David


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Heikki Linnakangas
Date:
Subject: Re: Interruptible sleeps (was Re: CommitFest 2009-07: Yay, Kevin! Thanks, reviewers!)
Next
From: "Eric Simon"
Date:
Subject: Problem Using PQcancel in a Synchronous Query