Re: [Proposal] Fully WAL logged CREATE DATABASE - No Checkpoints - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: [Proposal] Fully WAL logged CREATE DATABASE - No Checkpoints
Date
Msg-id 102026.1659802004@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [Proposal] Fully WAL logged CREATE DATABASE - No Checkpoints  (Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: [Proposal] Fully WAL logged CREATE DATABASE - No Checkpoints
List pgsql-hackers
Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut@gmail.com> writes:
> On Fri, Aug 5, 2022 at 10:43 AM Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Yeah maybe it is not necessary to close as these unowned smgr will
>> automatically get closed on the transaction end.

I do not think this is a great idea for the per-relation smgrs created
during RelationCopyStorageUsingBuffer.  Yeah, they'll be mopped up at
transaction end, but that doesn't mean that creating possibly tens of
thousands of transient smgrs isn't going to cause performance issues.

I think RelationCopyStorageUsingBuffer needs to open and then close
the smgrs it uses, which means that ReadBufferWithoutRelcache is not the
appropriate API for it to use, either; need to go down another level.

            regards, tom lane



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: [Proposal] Fully WAL logged CREATE DATABASE - No Checkpoints
Next
From: Andrew Dunstan
Date:
Subject: Re: `make check` doesn't pass on MacOS Catalina