Re: Lets (not) break all the things. Was: [pgsql-advocacy]9.6 -> 10.0 - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Yury Zhuravlev
Subject Re: Lets (not) break all the things. Was: [pgsql-advocacy]9.6 -> 10.0
Date
Msg-id 0f547b0d-59e9-48d0-9d49-acea51790b92@postgrespro.ru
Whole thread Raw
In response to Lets (not) break all the things. Was: [pgsql-advocacy] 9.6 -> 10.0  (Justin Clift <justin@postgresql.org>)
Responses Re: Lets (not) break all the things. Was: [pgsql-advocacy] 9.6 -> 10.0  (Justin Clift <justin@postgresql.org>)
List pgsql-hackers
Justin Clift wrote:
> Simon included a short starter list of potentials which might be in
> that category:
>
>   * SQL compliant identifiers
>   * Remove RULEs
>   * Change recovery.conf
>   * Change block headers
>   * Retire template0, template1
>   * Optimise FSM
>   * Add heap metapage
>   * Alter tuple headers
>   et al

+ CMake build I think.

Now I can build:
* postgres
* bin/* programs
* pl/* languages
* contrib/* (with cmake PGXS analogue)

Can run regression and isolation tests for postgres/pl* and all contrib
modules.

There is still a lot of work but I hope everything will turn out. Also it
would be good to get help.

Thanks.

PS https://github.com/stalkerg/postgres_cmake

--
Yury Zhuravlev
Postgres Professional: http://www.postgrespro.com
The Russian Postgres Company



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Pavel Stehule
Date:
Subject: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Code cleanup in the wake of recent LWLock refactoring.
Next
From: Alexander Korotkov
Date:
Subject: Re: Some other things about contrib/bloom and generic_xlog.c