Re: [HACKERS] Fix performance of generic atomics - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Jesper Pedersen
Subject Re: [HACKERS] Fix performance of generic atomics
Date
Msg-id 0effb79a-fc34-f59d-ddab-d65c720a4257@redhat.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] Fix performance of generic atomics  (Jeff Janes <jeff.janes@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
Hi Jeff,

On 09/05/2017 03:47 PM, Jeff Janes wrote:
>> I ran pgbench (-M prepared) with synchronous_commit 'on' and 'off' using
>> both logged and unlogged tables. Also ran an internal benchmark which
>> didn't show anything either.
>>
> 
> What scale factor and client count? How many cores per socket?  It looks
> like Sokolov was just starting to see gains at 200 clients on 72 cores,
> using -N transaction.

I have done a run with scale factor 300, and another with 3000 on a 
2S/28C/56T/256Gb w/ 2 x RAID10 SSD machine; up to 200 clients.

I would consider the runs as "noise" as I'm seeing +-1% for all client 
counts, so nothing like Yura is seeing in [1] for the higher client counts.

I did a run with -N too using scale factor 300, using the settings in 
[1], but with same result (+-1%).

[1] 
https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/d62d7d9d473d07e172d799d5a57e70be@postgrespro.ru

Best regards, Jesper



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Simon Riggs
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] ALTER INDEX .. SET STATISTICS ... behaviour
Next
From: Jacob Champion
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH] Add citext_pattern_ops to citext contrib module