On 2018/04/13 19:08, Michael Paquier wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 13, 2018 at 02:15:35PM +0530, amul sul wrote:
>> I have looked into this and found that the issue is in heap_xlog_delete -- we
>> have missed to set the correct offset number from the target_tid when
>> XLH_DELETE_IS_PARTITION_MOVE flag is set.
>
> Oh, this looks good to me. So when a row was moved across partitions
> this could have caused incorrect tuple references on a standby, which
> could have caused corruptions.
>
> wal_consistency_checking is proving to be worth its cost here...
+1
Thanks,
Amit
