Hi,
On November 5, 2017 1:33:24 PM PST, Jim Van Fleet <vanfleet@us.ibm.com> wrote:
>Ran this change with hammerdb on a power 8 firestone
>
>with 2 socket, 20 core
>9.6 base -- 451991 NOPM
>0926_master -- 464385 NOPM
>11_04master -- 449177 NOPM
>11_04_patch -- 431423 NOPM
>-- two socket patch is a little down from previous base runs
>
>With one socket
>9.6 base -- 393727 NOPM
>v10rc1_base -- 350958 NOPM
>11_04master -- 306506 NOPM
>11_04_patch -- 313179 NOPM
>-- one socket 11_04 master is quite a bit down from 9.6 and
>v10rc1_base
>-- the patch is up a bit over the base
>
>Net -- the patch is about the same as current base on two socket, and
>on
>one socket -- consistent with your pgbench (?) findings
>
>As an aside, it is perhaps a worry that one socket is down over 20%
>from
>9.6 and over 10% from v10rc1
What query(s) did you measure?
Andres
--
Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
