On Nov 4, 2014, at 4:20 PM, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net> wrote:
> On 11/3/14 5:17 PM, Petr Jelinek wrote:
>>> Please don't name anything "committs". That looks like a misspelling of
>>> something.
>>>
>>> There is nothing wrong with
>>>
>>> pg_get_transaction_commit_timestamp()
>>>
>>> If you want to reduce the length, lose the "get".
>>
>> I am fine with that, I only wonder if your definition of "anything" only
>> concerns the SQL interfaces or also the internals.
>
> I'd be fine with commit_ts for internals, but not committs.
I agree that committs is poor. But I'd argue for spelling out commit_timestamp everywhere. It is more clear and easier
togrep.
...Robert
