Hi Tom-san.
> "Hiroshi Saito" <z-saito@guitar.ocn.ne.jp> writes:
>> Is this message necessary for setting errno again?
>
> AFAIR we only intended that message as a temporary measure until we'd
> figured out why things seemed to be failing on Windows. If there's no
> longer a need, I'd vote for removing the whole code chunk, not just
> stepping the level down by one. But if you are still seeing it, maybe
> we haven't figured out why the failure?
Yes, it might be not necessary.
I agrees. thanks!
Regards,
Hiroshi Saito
