Re: Arch (was RE: Refactoring of command.c ) - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Rod Taylor
Subject Re: Arch (was RE: Refactoring of command.c )
Date
Msg-id 038a01c1c05f$bd5ded00$8001a8c0@jester
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Arch (was RE: Refactoring of command.c )  ("Christopher Kings-Lynne" <chriskl@familyhealth.com.au>)
List pgsql-hackers
> Imagine you want to develop a massive new feature for Postgres.  You
just
> create a branch on your own machine, do all your changes, commits,
etc. and
> keep it current with the main branch. Then, you can merge it back
into the
> main tree...  That way you can have a history of commits on your own
branch
> of the repo!

The same thing can be accomplished with CVS as well -- it's just not
as pretty.   There is a reason that the FreeBSD group uses $FreeBSD$
and leaves $Id$ untouched.

Basically, check out of one, drop CVS directories, check into the
second, check out of the second, and when doing work with either
repository you specify which repo with the -D flag.  Coupled with
the -j (merge) flag you can accomplish most tasks.

That said, if the work was thought through and beneficial you may be
able to obtain a branch in postgresql cvs to work with.



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Karel Zak
Date:
Subject: Re: Oracle vs PostgreSQL in real life
Next
From: bpalmer
Date:
Subject: Re: Oracle vs PostgreSQL in real life