Re: pgc.l modif. has been overwritten again - Mailing list pgsql-interfaces
From | Nicolas Bazin |
---|---|
Subject | Re: pgc.l modif. has been overwritten again |
Date | |
Msg-id | 016a01c1d559$757a75d0$660d090a@software.ingenico.com.au Whole thread Raw |
In response to | pgc.l modif. has been overwritten again ("Nicolas Bazin" <nbazin@ingenico.com.au>) |
List | pgsql-interfaces |
Sorry for the order of the patch. Here is the exchange I had with Micheal. For a test case try to ecpg with test1.pgc modified this way: .... exec sql begin declare section;typedef char string[NAMELEN + 1]; intarray amount;int increment=100; char name[AMOUNT][NAMELEN+1];charletter[AMOUNT][1]; exec sql ifdef NAMELEN;struct name_letter_struct{ char name[NAMELEN + 1]; int amount; char letter;} name_letter[AMOUNT]; exec sql endif; struct ind_struct { short a; short b; short c; } ind[AMOUNT];char command[128]; .... Nicolas ----- Original Message ----- From: "Nicolas Bazin" <nbazin@ingenico.com.au> To: "Tom Lane" <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> Cc: <pgsql-interfaces@postgresql.org> Sent: Wednesday, March 27, 2002 4:46 PM Subject: Re: [INTERFACES] pgc.l modif. has been overwritten again > They are not in postgresql-7.2.1.tar.gz > I just checked the repositary with the CVS web interface and the modif are > not in there. > In CVS you get > <<EOF>> { > if ( preproc_tos > 0 ) > { > preproc_tos = 0; > mmerror(PARSE_ERROR, ET_FATAL, "Missing > 'EXEC SQL ENDIF;'"); > } > if (yy_buffer == NULL) > yyterminate(); > else > > > where is should be: > > <<EOF>> { > if (yy_buffer == NULL) { > if ( preproc_tos > 0 ) > { > preproc_tos = 0; > mmerror(PARSE_ERROR, ET_FATAL, > "Missing 'EXEC SQL ENDIF;'"); > } > yyterminate(); > } else > > And looking and the history of this file I don't see the modif beeing > applied. But I know that at some stage it was applied by Bruce momjian and > overwritten by Mickeal Meskes ??? > > Nicolas > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Tom Lane" <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> > To: "Nicolas Bazin" <nbazin@ingenico.com.au> > Cc: <pgsql-interfaces@postgresql.org> > Sent: Wednesday, March 27, 2002 4:26 PM > Subject: Re: [INTERFACES] pgc.l modif. has been overwritten again > > > > "Nicolas Bazin" <nbazin@ingenico.com.au> writes: > > > We need a little bit of order when several people can commit on the > source = > > > code, It would be nice that they update their local copy and then > commit, o= > > > r check the directory or check for conflicts.=20 > > > > AFAICT these changes *are* in current sources. > > > > regards, tom lane > > > > > I can give it a try, but I'm not familiar with lex and yacc so I can't promise anything. Nicolas ----- Original Message ----- From: "Michael Meskes" <meskes@postgresql.org> To: "Nicolas Bazin" <nbazin@ingenico.com.au> Cc: <pgsql-interfaces@postgresql.org> Sent: Monday, March 11, 2002 11:55 PM Subject: Re: Subject: Re: Additional fixes to ecpg - please apply patch > On Mon, Mar 11, 2002 at 12:41:33PM +1100, Nicolas Bazin wrote: > > It works except that you overwrote a previous patch I submitted that was already applied (see mail joined). > > I'm sorry for that. Since I thought cvs would merge the changes I didn't > check. > > > Sorry for sending you a diff in the wrong order. > > No problem. > > > Also I though the type definition syntax could be enhanced. Instaead of defining > > ... > > Both syntax can be maintained for compatibility of existing > > application, but I find the second one easier to maintain because > > there is no code duplication.Can you do it ? Nicolas > > Yes, you are right. The first should be kept for compatibility, but the > second i seasier to use. I will ad this to my todo list. But I have no > idea at all, when I will find time to implement it. So, if you can send > patches, they are more than welcome. > > Michael > -- > Michael Meskes > Michael@Fam-Meskes.De > Go SF 49ers! Go Rhein Fire! > Use Debian GNU/Linux! Use PostgreSQL! >
pgsql-interfaces by date: