Re: pg_stat_reset() weirdness - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Christopher Kings-Lynne
Subject Re: pg_stat_reset() weirdness
Date
Msg-id 009e01c24053$6376aba0$0200a8c0@SOL
Whole thread Raw
In response to pg_stat_reset() weirdness  ("Christopher Kings-Lynne" <chriskl@familyhealth.com.au>)
List pgsql-hackers
Hang on - I _can't_ fix the function defiition - it returns a bool and
that's why it's failing.  I can't have it returning a void because it's not
possible.  Check list of all other excluded functions as well...

Chris

----- Original Message -----
From: "Tom Lane" <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: "Christopher Kings-Lynne" <chriskl@familyhealth.com.au>
Cc: "Hackers" <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Sent: Friday, August 09, 2002 9:50 PM
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] pg_stat_reset() weirdness


> "Christopher Kings-Lynne" <chriskl@familyhealth.com.au> writes:
> > If you apply the pg_stat_reset() function patch you get this regression
> > failure.  Is this because it's returning a bool I guess?  Shall I just
fix
> > the regression test to exclude this function?
>
> No, you should fix the function definition.  The sanity checks are there
> for a reason.
>
> regards, tom lane
>



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tatsuo Ishii
Date:
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] workaround for lack of REPLACE() function
Next
From: "Christopher Kings-Lynne"
Date:
Subject: Re: pg_stat_reset() weirdness