Re: [GENERAL] workaround for lack of REPLACE() function - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tatsuo Ishii
Subject Re: [GENERAL] workaround for lack of REPLACE() function
Date
Msg-id 20020810.155126.94070513.t-ishii@sra.co.jp
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [GENERAL] workaround for lack of REPLACE() function  (Joe Conway <mail@joeconway.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
> Any objection if I rework this function to meet SQL92 and fix the bug? 

I don't object.

> Or is the SQL92 part not desirable because it breaks backward 
> compatability?

I don't think so.

> In any case, can the #ifdef MULTIBYTE's be removed now in favor of a 
> test for encoding max length?

Sure.
--
Tatsuo Ishii


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Mark Kirkwood
Date:
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] Linux Largefile Support In Postgresql RPMS
Next
From: "Christopher Kings-Lynne"
Date:
Subject: Re: pg_stat_reset() weirdness