Apart from the already known issue of corruption on power loss (which ought
to be soluble - presumably the commercial heavyweights don't suffer from
this problem), I can't see any reason to have low expectations of the w32
port.
My experience, and apparently that of others, running the PeerDirect port,
has been entirely painfree.
I understand people's feelings about this - I'm a Unix kinda guy myself, and
will choose some flavor of it every time if given the choice. Often, I don't
have a choice, for a variety of reasons, some good and some not. That's why
the W32 port is important.
andrew
----- Original Message -----
From: "Tom Lane" <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: "Matthew T. O'Connor" <matthew@zeut.net>
Cc: "Dave Page" <dpage@vale-housing.co.uk>; "Bruce Momjian"
<pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>; "PostgreSQL-development"
<pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Sent: Tuesday, May 06, 2003 5:47 PM
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] 7.4 features list
> "Matthew T. O'Connor" <matthew@zeut.net> writes:
> > And, we don't have to say we fully support win32 in 7.4, we can call it
> > experimental or whatever.
>
> That might be a wise move in any case. Management of expectations and
> all that ;-)
>
> regards, tom lane
>
