Peter,
Yes, that makes a lot of sense. One problem might exist with the
sql.Types
Jdk 1.4 probably defines extra types which won't be defined in jdk 1.3.
Dave
-----Original Message-----
From: Peter Eisentraut [mailto:peter_e@gmx.net]
Sent: October 18, 2001 1:41 PM
To: Joseph Shraibman
Cc: Dave@micro-automation.net; pgsql-jdbc@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: [JDBC] J2SE 1.4 and other patches
Joseph Shraibman writes:
> Right. And a maintainer needs to make a jdbc3 direcotry and modifiy
> the ant files to use it when it detects a jdk of 1.4+
Couldn't the JDBC 3 stuff be implemented in the JDBC 2 driver as
extension? The only reason we have a jdbc1 vs jdbc2 split is so that we
can use jdk 1.2 functionality for the implementation of the JDBC 2
driver. So unless there is something in jdk 1.3 or 1.4 that is required
or really useful for JDBC 3 we could probably avoid opening up yet
another directory that always gets out of sync.
--
Peter Eisentraut peter_e@gmx.net http://funkturm.homeip.net/~peter
