Joseph Shraibman writes:
> Right. And a maintainer needs to make a jdbc3 direcotry and modifiy the ant files to use
> it when it detects a jdk of 1.4+
Couldn't the JDBC 3 stuff be implemented in the JDBC 2 driver as
extension? The only reason we have a jdbc1 vs jdbc2 split is so that we
can use jdk 1.2 functionality for the implementation of the JDBC 2
driver. So unless there is something in jdk 1.3 or 1.4 that is required
or really useful for JDBC 3 we could probably avoid opening up yet another
directory that always gets out of sync.
--
Peter Eisentraut peter_e@gmx.net http://funkturm.homeip.net/~peter
