Re: Ant configuration - Mailing list pgsql-patches

From Gunnar Rønning
Subject Re: Ant configuration
Date
Msg-id m2hesvrf1u.fsf@smaug.polygnosis.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Ant configuration  (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>)
Responses Re: Ant configuration  (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>)
List pgsql-patches
* Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us> wrote:
|
| I think I can safely at to TODO:
|
|     JDBC
|         o Move from Ant to Make builds

I don't think there is consesus over at the JDBC list yet. We need to get
all the pros/cons for both solutions on the table first. Make is not
neccesarily better than Ant, I would think a combination would work best.
Because then Mac and Windows users could use Ant to compile their JDBC
driver, while the compilation of the server on Unices would work
seamlessly.

--
Gunnar Rønning - gunnar@polygnosis.com
Senior Consultant, Polygnosis AS, http://www.polygnosis.com/

pgsql-patches by date:

Previous
From: Peter Eisentraut
Date:
Subject: Re: Showing index details with \d on psql
Next
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: Patch to fix memory leak in fetch in Python interface.