overflowing - Search results

2025-06-06 09:54:51 | RE: Logical replication 'invalid memory alloc request size 1585837200' after upgrading to 17.5 (Hayato Kuroda (Fujitsu))

OVERFLOWED; + elog(LOG, "RBTXN_DISTR_INVAL_OVERFLOWED is set to the transaction") ``` Method how I count

2025-06-06 06:43:28 | Re: Logical replication 'invalid memory alloc request size 1585837200' after upgrading to 17.5 (Amit Kapila)

overflow code path. One minor point to consider is that at the time, the value

2025-06-06 06:21:54 | Re: Logical replication 'invalid memory alloc request size 1585837200' after upgrading to 17.5 (Amit Kapila)

overflowed) for backbranches? In the previous email, you seemed to agree with the performance impact

2025-06-06 00:59:12 | Re: Logical replication 'invalid memory alloc request size 1585837200' after upgrading to 17.5 (Masahiko Sawada)

OVERFLOWED to RBTXN_DISTR_INVAL_OVERFLOWED, and it includes some comment updates. Please review them

2025-06-05 22:21:21 | Re: Logical replication 'invalid memory alloc request size 1585837200' after upgrading to 17.5 (Masahiko Sawada)

overflowed, we should mark other transactions as overflowed instead of distributing inval messages. Regards, -- Masahiko

2025-06-05 20:43:25 | Re: Logical replication 'invalid memory alloc request size 1585837200' after upgrading to 17.5 (Masahiko Sawada)

overflow cases and non-overflow cases also in test cases added in the future, improving

2025-06-05 15:14:43 | RE: Logical replication 'invalid memory alloc request size 1585837200' after upgrading to 17.5 (Hayato Kuroda (Fujitsu))

OVERFLOWED flag is set [650552] STATEMENT: START_REPLICATION SLOT "test" LOGICAL 0/0 ("proto_version" '4', "publication

2025-06-05 14:07:22 | RE: Logical replication 'invalid memory alloc request size 1585837200' after upgrading to 17.5 (Hayato Kuroda (Fujitsu))

overflow happens 7. S1: COMMIT; 8. S2: INSERT INTO d VALUES ('d3'); 9. S2: COMMIT

2025-06-05 13:28:30 | Re: Logical replication 'invalid memory alloc request size 1585837200' after upgrading to 17.5 (vignesh C)

OVERFLOWED txn. I have added comments for this, feel free to reword it if some

2025-06-05 09:20:04 | Re: Logical replication 'invalid memory alloc request size 1585837200' after upgrading to 17.5 (Amit Kapila)

overflowed(txn))" in function ReorderBufferAddInvalidations(). What is the need of such a check in this

2025-06-05 00:48:54 | Re: Logical replication 'invalid memory alloc request size 1585837200' after upgrading to 17.5 (Masahiko Sawada)

overflowed, we would miss executing the txn->invalidations here. Probably the same is true for ReorderBufferForget

2025-06-03 22:43:50 | Re: Logical replication 'invalid memory alloc request size 1585837200' after upgrading to 17.5 (Masahiko Sawada)

OVERFLOWED, it would explain the state of the transaction clearer. --- Can we have a reasonable

2025-05-30 07:01:19 | Re: Logical replication 'invalid memory alloc request size 1585837200' after upgrading to 17.5 (vignesh C)

overflow scenario. c) setting the newly added nentries_distr to -1, to indicate an overflow