Postgres Pro
Downloads
Home   >   mailing lists

Thread: is git.postgresql.org working fine?

is git.postgresql.org working fine?

From
Jaime Casanova
Date:
Hi everyone,

I just tried to clone from git.postgresql.org and it stalled at 99% of
receiving objects, but I could clone from github without any problems.

Is it only me?

--
Jaime Casanova
Director de Servicios Profesionales
SystemGuards - Consultores de PostgreSQL

Re: is git.postgresql.org working fine?

From
Tom Lane
Date:
Jaime Casanova <jcasanov@systemguards.com.ec> writes:
> I just tried to clone from git.postgresql.org and it stalled at 99% of
> receiving objects, but I could clone from github without any problems.

> Is it only me?

I've had trouble in the past with cloning on old/slow machines --- it
seems to time out after awhile.  But AFAIR the symptom was an error
message not "stalling", so maybe that's unrelated.

Anyway, I tried it just now and didn't observe any problem:

$ time git clone https://git.postgresql.org/git/postgresql.git pgsql-test
Cloning into 'pgsql-test'...
remote: Enumerating objects: 20234, done.
remote: Counting objects: 100% (20234/20234), done.
remote: Compressing objects: 100% (12190/12190), done.
remote: Total 1048178 (delta 14507), reused 10293 (delta 7971), pack-reused 1027944
Receiving objects: 100% (1048178/1048178), 351.80 MiB | 20.63 MiB/s, done.
Resolving deltas: 100% (904570/904570), done.

real    0m33.110s
user    1m9.249s
sys     0m3.785s

            regards, tom lane

Re: is git.postgresql.org working fine?

From
Aleksander Alekseev
Date:
Hi,

> > Is it only me?
>
> I've had trouble in the past with cloning on old/slow machines --- it
> seems to time out after awhile.  But AFAIR the symptom was an error
> message not "stalling", so maybe that's unrelated.
>
> Anyway, I tried it just now and didn't observe any problem:
>
> [...]

For me works fine too:

```
$ time git clone git://git.postgresql.org/git/postgresql.git
Cloning into 'postgresql'...
remote: Enumerating objects: 20275, done.
remote: Counting objects: 100% (20275/20275), done.
remote: Compressing objects: 100% (12231/12231), done.
remote: Total 1048219 (delta 14543), reused 10289 (delta 7971),
pack-reused 1027944
Receiving objects: 100% (1048219/1048219), 351.78 MiB | 1.30 MiB/s, done.
Resolving deltas: 100% (904606/904606), done.
Updating files: 100% (7096/7096), done.

real    4m53.197s
user    1m51.879s
sys    0m26.096s

$ git --version
git version 2.48.1
```

-- 
Best regards,
Aleksander Alekseev

Re: is git.postgresql.org working fine?

From
"258790519"
Date:

It seens that using git protocol is better than https

---Original---
From: "Aleksander Alekseev"<aleksander@timescale.com>
Date: Wed, Mar 5, 2025 21:18 PM
To: "PostgreSQL Hackers"<pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org>;
Cc: "Tom Lane"<tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>;"Jaime Casanova"<jcasanov@systemguards.com.ec>;
Subject: Re: is git.postgresql.org working fine?

Hi,

> > Is it only me?
>
> I've had trouble in the past with cloning on old/slow machines --- it
> seems to time out after awhile. But AFAIR the symptom was an error
> message not "stalling", so maybe that's unrelated.
>
> Anyway, I tried it just now and didn't observe any problem:
>
> [...]

For me works fine too:

```
$ time git clone git://git.postgresql.org/git/postgresql.git
Cloning into 'postgresql'...
remote: Enumerating objects: 20275, done.
remote: Counting objects: 100% (20275/20275), done.
remote: Compressing objects: 100% (12231/12231), done.
remote: Total 1048219 (delta 14543), reused 10289 (delta 7971),
pack-reused 1027944
Receiving objects: 100% (1048219/1048219), 351.78 MiB | 1.30 MiB/s, done.
Resolving deltas: 100% (904606/904606), done.
Updating files: 100% (7096/7096), done.

real 4m53.197s
user 1m51.879s
sys 0m26.096s

$ git --version
git version 2.48.1
```

--
Best regards,
Aleksander Alekseev