Thread: dynamic monitoring
Hi all,
In the section on dynamic monitoring, I found the following
sentence confusing. I originally read it as "enclose the script"
and "used to allow that too to be checked" instead of "enclose
the script used" and "to allow that too to be checked".
When discussing information found using dynamic tracing,
be sure to enclose the script used to allow that too to be
checked and discussed.
Could it be rephrased as something like this?
When discussing information found using dynamic tracing,
be sure to enclose the script used to find the information
so that both the script and the information can be checked
and discussed.
Regards,
Brad
C:\src\postgresql\doc\src\sgml>git diff -p
diff --git a/doc/src/sgml/monitoring.sgml b/doc/src/sgml/monitoring.sgml
index 71c4f96d05..d89261326a 100644
--- a/doc/src/sgml/monitoring.sgml
+++ b/doc/src/sgml/monitoring.sgml
@@ -7428,7 +7428,8 @@ Total time (ns) 2312105013
be meaningless. In most cases where problems are found it is the
instrumentation that is at fault, not the underlying system. When
discussing information found using dynamic tracing, be sure to enclose
- the script used to allow that too to be checked and discussed.
+ the script used to find that information so that both the script
+ and the information can be checked and discussed.
</para>
</sect2>
In the section on dynamic monitoring, I found the following
sentence confusing. I originally read it as "enclose the script"
and "used to allow that too to be checked" instead of "enclose
the script used" and "to allow that too to be checked".
When discussing information found using dynamic tracing,
be sure to enclose the script used to allow that too to be
checked and discussed.
Could it be rephrased as something like this?
When discussing information found using dynamic tracing,
be sure to enclose the script used to find the information
so that both the script and the information can be checked
and discussed.
Regards,
Brad
C:\src\postgresql\doc\src\sgml>git diff -p
diff --git a/doc/src/sgml/monitoring.sgml b/doc/src/sgml/monitoring.sgml
index 71c4f96d05..d89261326a 100644
--- a/doc/src/sgml/monitoring.sgml
+++ b/doc/src/sgml/monitoring.sgml
@@ -7428,7 +7428,8 @@ Total time (ns) 2312105013
be meaningless. In most cases where problems are found it is the
instrumentation that is at fault, not the underlying system. When
discussing information found using dynamic tracing, be sure to enclose
- the script used to allow that too to be checked and discussed.
+ the script used to find that information so that both the script
+ and the information can be checked and discussed.
</para>
</sect2>
On Fri, Feb 21, 2025 at 1:18 PM Brad DeJong <bpd0018@gmail.com> wrote: > > Hi all, > > In the section on dynamic monitoring, I found the following > sentence confusing. I originally read it as "enclose the script" > and "used to allow that too to be checked" instead of "enclose > the script used" and "to allow that too to be checked". > > When discussing information found using dynamic tracing, > be sure to enclose the script used to allow that too to be > checked and discussed. > > Could it be rephrased as something like this? > > When discussing information found using dynamic tracing, > be sure to enclose the script used to find the information > so that both the script and the information can be checked > and discussed. > > Regards, > Brad > > C:\src\postgresql\doc\src\sgml>git diff -p > diff --git a/doc/src/sgml/monitoring.sgml b/doc/src/sgml/monitoring.sgml > index 71c4f96d05..d89261326a 100644 > --- a/doc/src/sgml/monitoring.sgml > +++ b/doc/src/sgml/monitoring.sgml > @@ -7428,7 +7428,8 @@ Total time (ns) 2312105013 > be meaningless. In most cases where problems are found it is the > instrumentation that is at fault, not the underlying system. When > discussing information found using dynamic tracing, be sure to enclose > - the script used to allow that too to be checked and discussed. > + the script used to find that information so that both the script > + and the information can be checked and discussed. > </para> > </sect2> +1 from me. Robert Treat https://xzilla.net