Thread: Re: SQL/JSON json_table plan clause
Hi Amit!
No, JSON_TABLE is ok. I've meant that in the previous approach to PLAN clause
implementation there were some wrong tests.
On Tue, Feb 4, 2025 at 6:05 AM Amit Langote <amitlangote09@gmail.com> wrote:
Hi Nikita,
On Wed, Dec 18, 2024 at 12:11 AM Nikita Malakhov <hukutoc@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Hi hackers!
>
> This thread is further work continued in [1], where Amit Langote
> suggested starting discussion on the remaining SQL/JSON feature
> 'PLAN clause for JSON_TABLE' anew.
>
> We'd like to help with merging SQL/JSON patches into vanilla,
> and have adapted PLAN clause to recent changes in JSON_TABLE
> function.
Thanks for working on this.
> While doing this we've found that some tests with the PLAN clause
> were incorrect, along with JSON_TABLE behavior with this clause.
> We've corrected this behavior, but these corrections required reverting
> some removed and heavily refactored code, so we'd be glad for review
> and feedback on this patch.
Sorry, I don't fully understand this paragraph. Do you mean that
there might be bugs in the existing JSON_TABLE() functionality that
was committed into v17?
--
Thanks, Amit Langote