On Wed, Jan 22, 2025 at 01:54:32AM +0300, Melih Mutlu wrote:
> I confirm that the patch introduces some improvement in simple cases like
> the one you shared. I looked around a bit to understand whether there is an
> obvious reason why copying from a partitioned table is not allowed, but
> couldn't find one. It seems ok to me.
From the original discussion [0], it seems like it was considered a
nonessential part of an otherwise massive patch set. Perhaps it's time to
revisit it.
[0] https://postgr.es/m/CAA4eK1LqTqZkPSoonF5_cOz94OUZG9j0PNfLdhi_nPtW82fFVA%40mail.gmail.com
--
nathan
Есть вопросы? Напишите нам!
Соглашаюсь с условиями обработки персональных данных
✖
By continuing to browse this website, you agree to the use of cookies. Go to Privacy Policy.