Thread: "collation" or "collation oder"
Currently in the docs both "collation" and "collation order" are used. I think this is confusing because IMO "collation" implies "order", and "collation order" is redundant. Can we change "collation order" to "collation"? git grep shows followings: amcheck.sgml: collation order between a primary server and a standby server is charset.sgml: locale-specific collation order, number formatting, translated charset.sgml: settings can modify the collation order to suit a variety of needs. For ref/create_database.sgml: Sets the default collation order and character classification in the ref/create_database.sgml: <literal>libc</literal>, also sets the default collation order to use ref/create_database.sgml: collation order and character classification, overriding the setting ref/create_database.sgml: collation order and character classification, overriding the setting Best reagards, -- Tatsuo Ishii SRA OSS K.K. English: http://www.sraoss.co.jp/index_en/ Japanese:http://www.sraoss.co.jp
On 14.12.24 03:32, Tatsuo Ishii wrote: > Currently in the docs both "collation" and "collation order" are > used. I think this is confusing because IMO "collation" implies > "order", and "collation order" is redundant. I think there is a difference. A collation is a database object, a collation order is the order produced when invoking that collation. For example, in amcheck.sgml: """ ... an inconsistency in the collation order between a primary server and a standby server ... """ If we wrote just "collation" here I think it would be less clear, because what's the problem is whether the order is different, not whether the collation objects are different.
> I think there is a difference. A collation is a database object, a > collation order is the order produced when invoking that collation. > For example, in amcheck.sgml: > > """ > ... an inconsistency in the collation order between a primary server > and a standby server ... > """ > > If we wrote just "collation" here I think it would be less clear, > because what's the problem is whether the order is different, not > whether the collation objects are different. That makes sense. Thanks for the explanation. -- Tatsuo Ishii SRA OSS K.K. English: http://www.sraoss.co.jp/index_en/ Japanese:http://www.sraoss.co.jp