Andrei Lepikhov <lepihov@gmail.com> writes:
> I don't know whether to classify this as a bug. The sketch of the patch
> with an example isolation test is attached.
This seems like an extremely strange place (and an extremely
brute-force way) to insert an AcceptInvalidationMessages call.
Under what circumstances wouldn't we do one or more AIMs later
on, eg while acquiring locks?
regards, tom lane
