Thread: [Doc] Improve hostssl related descriptions and option presentation
Motivated by a recent complaint [1] I found the hostssl related material in our docs quite verbose and even repetitive. Some of that is normal since we have both an overview/walk-through section as well as a reference section. But the overview in particular was self-repetitive. Here is a first pass at some improvements. The commit message contains both the intent of the patch and some thoughts/questions still being considered.
David J.
Attachment
Re: [Doc] Improve hostssl related descriptions and option presentation
From
"David G. Johnston"
Date:
Thoughts anyone?
On Thu, Feb 1, 2024 at 3:47 PM David G. Johnston <david.g.johnston@gmail.com> wrote:
Motivated by a recent complaint [1] I found the hostssl related material in our docs quite verbose and even repetitive. Some of that is normal since we have both an overview/walk-through section as well as a reference section. But the overview in particular was self-repetitive. Here is a first pass at some improvements. The commit message contains both the intent of the patch and some thoughts/questions still being considered.David J.
Re: [Doc] Improve hostssl related descriptions and option presentation
From
"David G. Johnston"
Date:
On Mon, Apr 22, 2024 at 2:20 PM David G. Johnston <david.g.johnston@gmail.com> wrote:
Thoughts anyone?On Thu, Feb 1, 2024 at 3:47 PM David G. Johnston <david.g.johnston@gmail.com> wrote:Motivated by a recent complaint [1] I found the hostssl related material in our docs quite verbose and even repetitive. Some of that is normal since we have both an overview/walk-through section as well as a reference section. But the overview in particular was self-repetitive. Here is a first pass at some improvements. The commit message contains both the intent of the patch and some thoughts/questions still being considered.David J.
Withdrawn as this now has conflicts from recent changes and no one seems interested in voicing an opinion on this for or against.
David J.
On Fri, 28 Feb 2025 at 00:08, David G. Johnston <david.g.johnston@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Mon, Apr 22, 2024 at 2:20 PM David G. Johnston <david.g.johnston@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> Thoughts anyone? >> >> On Thu, Feb 1, 2024 at 3:47 PM David G. Johnston <david.g.johnston@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>> Motivated by a recent complaint [1] I found the hostssl related material in our docs quite verbose and even repetitive. Some of that is normal since we have both an overview/walk-through section as well as a reference section. Butthe overview in particular was self-repetitive. Here is a first pass at some improvements. The commit message containsboth the intent of the patch and some thoughts/questions still being considered. >>> >>> David J. >>> >>> [1] https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/170672433664.663.11895343120533141715%40wrigleys.postgresql.org > > > Withdrawn as this now has conflicts from recent changes and no one seems interested in voicing an opinion on this for oragainst. I've updated the commitfest entry status to "withdrawn." Feel free to add it again anytime if you change your mind. Regards, Vignesh
Re: [Doc] Improve hostssl related descriptions and option presentation
From
"David G. Johnston"
Date:
On Sunday, March 9, 2025, vignesh C <vignesh21@gmail.com> wrote:
On Fri, 28 Feb 2025 at 00:08, David G. Johnston
<david.g.johnston@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Apr 22, 2024 at 2:20 PM David G. Johnston <david.g.johnston@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> Thoughts anyone?
>>
>> On Thu, Feb 1, 2024 at 3:47 PM David G. Johnston <david.g.johnston@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> Motivated by a recent complaint [1] I found the hostssl related material in our docs quite verbose and even repetitive. Some of that is normal since we have both an overview/walk-through section as well as a reference section. But the overview in particular was self-repetitive. Here is a first pass at some improvements. The commit message contains both the intent of the patch and some thoughts/questions still being considered.
>>>
>>> David J.
>>>
>>> [1] https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/170672433664.663. 11895343120533141715% 40wrigleys.postgresql.org
>
>
> Withdrawn as this now has conflicts from recent changes and no one seems interested in voicing an opinion on this for or against.
I've updated the commitfest entry status to "withdrawn." Feel free to
add it again anytime if you change your mind.
Thanks. Apparently I ended up with two CF entries for this and I only withdrew one of them.
David J.