Postgres Pro
Downloads
Home   >   mailing lists

Thread: vacuumdb did not analyze all tables?=

vacuumdb did not analyze all tables?=

From
Ron Johnson
Date:
  vacuumdb 15.3
database instance: 9.6.24

I manually analyzed 71 tables this morning at 10:42.  (All those with "rp20_y2021" in the relname.)

Three of the 71 tables were not analyzed.  Why would that be?

(Five were not vacuumed, but I accept that some other process might have blocked them.)

vacuumdb -U postgres -h $DbServer --analyze -j6 -t ... -t cds.cdstransaction_rp20_y2021 -t ...

TAPb=# select schemaname||'.'||relname as table_name
            , last_vacuum
            , last_analyze
from pg_stat_user_tables
where schemaname||'.'||relname in ('cds.cdstransaction_rp20_y2021'
                                 , 'css.image_annotation_rp20_y2021'
                                 , 'tms.document_rp20_y2021')
order by 1;
           table_name            |          last_vacuum          |         last_analyze          
---------------------------------+-------------------------------+-------------------------------
 cds.cdstransaction_rp20_y2021   | 2023-12-13 10:42:09.683143-05 | 2023-11-17 04:11:08.761861-05
 css.image_annotation_rp20_y2021 | 2023-09-25 20:00:07.831722-04 | 2023-09-25 20:00:07.831793-04
 tms.document_rp20_y2021         | 2023-12-13 10:42:03.079969-05 | 2023-11-17 04:11:56.583881-05
(3 rows)

Re: vacuumdb did not analyze all tables?=

From
Francisco Olarte
Date:
Ron:

On Thu, 14 Dec 2023 at 03:39, Ron Johnson <ronljohnsonjr@gmail.com> wrote:
...
> Three of the 71 tables were not analyzed.  Why would that be?
...
> vacuumdb -U postgres -h $DbServer --analyze -j6 -t ... -t cds.cdstransaction_rp20_y2021 -t ...
...
>  cds.cdstransaction_rp20_y2021   | 2023-12-13 10:42:09.683143-05 | 2023-11-17 04:11:08.761861-05
>  css.image_annotation_rp20_y2021 | 2023-09-25 20:00:07.831722-04 | 2023-09-25 20:00:07.831793-04
>  tms.document_rp20_y2021         | 2023-12-13 10:42:03.079969-05 | 2023-11-17 04:11:56.583881-05

I'm not sure if you kept the line, but you have ellipsed-out ( is that
a word? ) the interesting names, so quoted vacuumdb line is useless
for check.

Francisco Olarte.

Re: vacuumdb did not analyze all tables?=

From
Ron Johnson
Date:
On Thu, Dec 14, 2023 at 12:20 PM Francisco Olarte <folarte@peoplecall.com> wrote:
Ron:

On Thu, 14 Dec 2023 at 03:39, Ron Johnson <ronljohnsonjr@gmail.com> wrote:
...
> Three of the 71 tables were not analyzed.  Why would that be?
...
> vacuumdb -U postgres -h $DbServer --analyze -j6 -t ... -t cds.cdstransaction_rp20_y2021 -t ...
...
>  cds.cdstransaction_rp20_y2021   | 2023-12-13 10:42:09.683143-05 | 2023-11-17 04:11:08.761861-05
>  css.image_annotation_rp20_y2021 | 2023-09-25 20:00:07.831722-04 | 2023-09-25 20:00:07.831793-04
>  tms.document_rp20_y2021         | 2023-12-13 10:42:03.079969-05 | 2023-11-17 04:11:56.583881-05

I'm not sure if you kept the line, but you have ellipsed-out ( is that
a word? )

I think so.
 
the interesting names, so quoted vacuumdb line is useless
for check.
 
71 tables were listed, and didn't want to flood my email with a KB or two of non-essential text.

I verified that all three tables were in the vacuumdb command line.  (The list was generated by a query, and stdout and stderr were redirected to a file, and I grepped it for the table names.)

If you want, I can attach the log file.


Re: vacuumdb did not analyze all tables?=

From
pf@pfortin.com
Date:
On Thu, 14 Dec 2023 13:10:16 -0500 Ron Johnson wrote:

>> I'm not sure if you kept the line, but you have ellipsed-out ( is that
>> a word? )  

ellipse:  curve
ellipsis:  ...

Re: vacuumdb did not analyze all tables?=

From
"David G. Johnston"
Date:
On Thu, Dec 14, 2023 at 5:46 PM <pf@pfortin.com> wrote:
On Thu, 14 Dec 2023 13:10:16 -0500 Ron Johnson wrote:

>> I'm not sure if you kept the line, but you have ellipsed-out ( is that
>> a word? ) 

ellipse:  curve
ellipsis:  ...


Though in contect "redacted" makes sense too.

David J.

Re: vacuumdb did not analyze all tables?=

From
Ron Johnson
Date:
On Thu, Dec 14, 2023 at 7:51 PM David G. Johnston <david.g.johnston@gmail.com> wrote:
On Thu, Dec 14, 2023 at 5:46 PM <pf@pfortin.com> wrote:
On Thu, 14 Dec 2023 13:10:16 -0500 Ron Johnson wrote:

>> I'm not sure if you kept the line, but you have ellipsed-out ( is that
>> a word? ) 

ellipse:  curve
ellipsis:  ...


Though in contect "redacted" makes sense too.

Context, not contect.  :D