Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@enterprisedb.com> writes:
> More portability cruft cleanup: Our own definition of offsetof() was
> only relevant for ancient systems and can surely be removed.
+1, it's required by C99.
regards, tom lane
Есть вопросы? Напишите нам!
Соглашаюсь с условиями обработки персональных данных
✖
By continuing to browse this website, you agree to the use of cookies. Go to Privacy Policy.