Thread: COPY FROM FORMAT CSV FORCE_NULL(*) ?
Hi, there.
copy force null git commit didn't attach a discussion link. So I don't know if it's already been discussed.
Current seem you cannot do
COPY forcetest FROM STDIN WITH (FORMAT csv, FORCE_NULL(*));
can we have FORCE_NULL(*)? Since We already have FORCE_QUOTE(*).
I recommend David Deutsch's <<The Beginning of Infinity>>
Jian
On 2022-07-25 Mo 00:18, jian he wrote: > Hi, there. > > copy force null git commit > <https://git.postgresql.org/gitweb/?p=postgresql.git;a=commit;h=3b5e03dca2afea7a2c12dbc8605175d0568b5555> > didn't attach a discussion link. So I don't know if it's already been > discussed. > > Current seem you cannot do > COPY forcetest FROM STDIN WITH (FORMAT csv, FORCE_NULL(*)); > > can we have FORCE_NULL(*)? Since We already have FORCE_QUOTE(*). > We only started adding discussion links in later years. Here's a link to the original discussion. <https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/CAB8KJ%3DjS-Um4TGwenS5wLUfJK6K4rNOm_V6GRUj%2BtcKekL2%3DGQ%40mail.gmail.com> Offhand I don't see why we shouldn't have this. Someone interested enough would need to submit a patch. cheers andrew -- Andrew Dunstan EDB: https://www.enterprisedb.com
Hi,
Agree, FORCE_NULL(*) is useful as well as FORCE_NOT_NULL(*).
We can have them both.
They are useful when users copy tables that have many columns.
Agree, FORCE_NULL(*) is useful as well as FORCE_NOT_NULL(*).
We can have them both.
They are useful when users copy tables that have many columns.
Regards,
Zhang Mingli
On Jul 25, 2022, 21:28 +0800, Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>, wrote:
On 2022-07-25 Mo 00:18, jian he wrote:Hi, there.
copy force null git commit
<https://git.postgresql.org/gitweb/?p=postgresql.git;a=commit;h=3b5e03dca2afea7a2c12dbc8605175d0568b5555>
didn't attach a discussion link. So I don't know if it's already been
discussed.
Current seem you cannot do
COPY forcetest FROM STDIN WITH (FORMAT csv, FORCE_NULL(*));
can we have FORCE_NULL(*)? Since We already have FORCE_QUOTE(*).
We only started adding discussion links in later years. Here's a link to
the original discussion.
<https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/CAB8KJ%3DjS-Um4TGwenS5wLUfJK6K4rNOm_V6GRUj%2BtcKekL2%3DGQ%40mail.gmail.com>
Offhand I don't see why we shouldn't have this. Someone interested
enough would need to submit a patch.
cheers
andrew
--
Andrew Dunstan
EDB: https://www.enterprisedb.com