Thread: Logical replication of large objects

Logical replication of large objects

From
Andreas Joseph Krogh
Date:

I started this thread 5 years ago: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/7c70d9bd-76fc-70fa-cfec-14f00a4a49c3%40matrix.gatewaynet.com#15cbf1c82be9341e551e60e287264380

 

We'd be willing to help funding development needed to support Large Object logical replication.

Anyone interested?

 

--
Andreas Joseph Krogh
CTO / Partner - Visena AS
Mobile: +47 909 56 963
Attachment

Re: Logical replication of large objects

From
Joshua Drake
Date:
Large objects are largely considered a deprecated feature.

Though I like the idea, was there any consensus on -hackers?

JD

On Sun, Jun 5, 2022 at 2:23 AM Andreas Joseph Krogh <andreas@visena.com> wrote:

I started this thread 5 years ago: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/7c70d9bd-76fc-70fa-cfec-14f00a4a49c3%40matrix.gatewaynet.com#15cbf1c82be9341e551e60e287264380

 

We'd be willing to help funding development needed to support Large Object logical replication.

Anyone interested?

 

--
Andreas Joseph Krogh
CTO / Partner - Visena AS
Mobile: +47 909 56 963
Attachment

Re: Logical replication of large objects

From
Andreas Joseph Krogh
Date:
På torsdag 09. juni 2022 kl. 20:24:56, skrev Joshua Drake <jd@commandprompt.com>:

Large objects are largely considered a deprecated feature.

 
Though I like the idea, was there any consensus on -hackers?

Nobody seems interested in it…

 

--
Andreas Joseph Krogh
CTO / Partner - Visena AS
Mobile: +47 909 56 963
 
Attachment