Thread: broken link to "SELinux guide" from sepgsql
Hello, on https://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/sepgsql.html the "SELinux User's and Administrator's Guide" link to https://access.redhat.com/documentation/en-US/Red_Hat_Enterprise_Linux/7/html/SELinux_Users_and_Administrators_Guide/ is broken, leads to 404. Proper URI would be, apparently, https://access.redhat.com/documentation/en-us/red_hat_enterprise_linux/7/html/selinux_users_and_administrators_guide/index -- Anton Voloshin Postgres Professional, The Russian Postgres Company https://postgrespro.ru
On Wed, Oct 27, 2021 at 02:01:24PM +0700, Anton Voloshin wrote: > on https://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/sepgsql.html > the "SELinux User's and Administrator's Guide" link to https://access.redhat.com/documentation/en-US/Red_Hat_Enterprise_Linux/7/html/SELinux_Users_and_Administrators_Guide/ > is broken, leads to 404. > > Proper URI would be, apparently, > https://access.redhat.com/documentation/en-us/red_hat_enterprise_linux/7/html/selinux_users_and_administrators_guide/index Indeed, that's broken. Will fix as per your suggestion. -- Michael
Attachment
On Wed, Oct 27, 2021 at 05:09:41PM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote: > Indeed, that's broken. Will fix as per your suggestion. And done down to 10 as of cc1853b. 9.6 used a different link that was already dead, and this version will be EOL'd soon, so I did not bother changing it. -- Michael
Attachment
> On 28 Oct 2021, at 02:28, Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz> wrote: > > On Wed, Oct 27, 2021 at 05:09:41PM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote: >> Indeed, that's broken. Will fix as per your suggestion. > > And done down to 10 as of cc1853b. 9.6 used a different link that was > already dead, and this version will be EOL'd soon, so I did not bother > changing it. The document linked to from 9.6 was at some point 301 redirected to the below URL, and later the redirect was no longer maintained. https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/Fedora/13/html/Security-Enhanced_Linux/ AFAICT it's the same document, but updated. If we want to leave 9.6 in as much of a working state as possible I think it makes sense to change to that one. I'm happy to do it if you concur. -- Daniel Gustafsson https://vmware.com/
On Thu, Oct 28, 2021 at 01:34:40PM +0200, Daniel Gustafsson wrote: > AFAICT it's the same document, but updated. If we want to leave 9.6 in as much > of a working state as possible I think it makes sense to change to that one. > I'm happy to do it if you concur. Sure. That's fine by me. -- Michael
Attachment
> On 28 Oct 2021, at 14:37, Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz> wrote: > > On Thu, Oct 28, 2021 at 01:34:40PM +0200, Daniel Gustafsson wrote: >> AFAICT it's the same document, but updated. If we want to leave 9.6 in as much >> of a working state as possible I think it makes sense to change to that one. >> I'm happy to do it if you concur. > > Sure. That's fine by me. Applied. Turns out that according to archive.org, the links in the 9.6 docs were redirecting to the URL I referenced already by the time of the initial sepgsql commit. Now we'll at least avoid 404's on those when we freeze the docs in time. -- Daniel Gustafsson https://vmware.com/