Thread: How to I select value of GUC that has - in its name?
Hi, question from IRC, but I couldn't find an answer. I can set custom guc with - in name, but I can't figure out how to select it. Without minus, it works great: =$ psql -X -c 'show custom.guc' ERROR: unrecognized configuration parameter "custom.guc" =$ psql -X -c "alter user depesz set custom.guc = '123'" ALTER ROLE =$ psql -X -c 'show custom.guc' custom.guc ------------ 123 (1 row) If I'd try to set variable with - in name: $ alter user depesz set custom.bad-guc = '1a'; ERROR: syntax error at or near "-" LINE 1: alter user depesz set custom.bad-guc = '1a'; ^ $ alter user depesz set custom."bad-guc" = '1a'; ALTER ROLE $ select * from pg_db_role_setting where setrole = 'depesz'::regrole; setdatabase │ setrole │ setconfig ─────────────┼─────────┼───────────────────────────────────────────────────────── 0 │ 16384 │ {application_name=xxx,custom.guc=123,custom.bad-guc=1a} (1 row) OK. Looks like it's set. But I can't show it (this is after reconnect): $ show custom."bad-guc"; ERROR: unrecognized configuration parameter "custom.bad-guc" $ show "custom"."bad-guc"; ERROR: unrecognized configuration parameter "custom.bad-guc" $ show "custom.bad-guc"; ERROR: unrecognized configuration parameter "custom.bad-guc" I know I can simply not use dashes in names, but if I can *set* it, how can I get the value back? depesz
On 09/02/2021 14:40, hubert depesz lubaczewski wrote: > Hi, > question from IRC, but I couldn't find an answer. > > I can set custom guc with - in name, but I can't figure out how to > select it. > > Without minus, it works great: > > =$ psql -X -c 'show custom.guc' > ERROR: unrecognized configuration parameter "custom.guc" > > =$ psql -X -c "alter user depesz set custom.guc = '123'" > ALTER ROLE > > =$ psql -X -c 'show custom.guc' > custom.guc > ------------ > 123 > (1 row) > > If I'd try to set variable with - in name: > > $ alter user depesz set custom.bad-guc = '1a'; > ERROR: syntax error at or near "-" > LINE 1: alter user depesz set custom.bad-guc = '1a'; Have you tried enclosing "bad-guc" in double quotes? Eddy
On Tue, Feb 09, 2021 at 02:49:19PM +0000, Edward Macnaghten wrote: > > $ alter user depesz set custom.bad-guc = '1a'; > > ERROR: syntax error at or near "-" > > LINE 1: alter user depesz set custom.bad-guc = '1a'; > Have you tried enclosing "bad-guc" in double quotes? I'm sorry, but have you read my mail? I did. On set and on reading. Best regards, depesz
On 2/9/21 6:40 AM, hubert depesz lubaczewski wrote: > Hi, > question from IRC, but I couldn't find an answer. > > I can set custom guc with - in name, but I can't figure out how to > select it. > > Without minus, it works great: > > =$ psql -X -c 'show custom.guc' > ERROR: unrecognized configuration parameter "custom.guc" > > =$ psql -X -c "alter user depesz set custom.guc = '123'" > ALTER ROLE > > =$ psql -X -c 'show custom.guc' > custom.guc > ------------ > 123 > (1 row) > > If I'd try to set variable with - in name: > > $ alter user depesz set custom.bad-guc = '1a'; > ERROR: syntax error at or near "-" > LINE 1: alter user depesz set custom.bad-guc = '1a'; > ^ > $ alter user depesz set custom."bad-guc" = '1a'; > ALTER ROLE > > $ select * from pg_db_role_setting where setrole = 'depesz'::regrole; > setdatabase │ setrole │ setconfig > ─────────────┼─────────┼───────────────────────────────────────────────────────── > 0 │ 16384 │ {application_name=xxx,custom.guc=123,custom.bad-guc=1a} > (1 row) > > OK. Looks like it's set. But I can't show it (this is after reconnect): > > $ show custom."bad-guc"; > ERROR: unrecognized configuration parameter "custom.bad-guc" > > $ show "custom"."bad-guc"; > ERROR: unrecognized configuration parameter "custom.bad-guc" > > $ show "custom.bad-guc"; > ERROR: unrecognized configuration parameter "custom.bad-guc" > > I know I can simply not use dashes in names, but if I can *set* it, how > can I get the value back? The only way I found so far is: select setconfig[array_position(setconfig, 'custom.bad-guc=1a')] from pg_db_role_setting where setrole = 'aklaver'::regrole; setconfig ------------------- custom.bad-guc=1a > > depesz > > -- Adrian Klaver adrian.klaver@aklaver.com
On Tue, Feb 09, 2021 at 07:41:02AM -0800, Adrian Klaver wrote: > The only way I found so far is: > select setconfig[array_position(setconfig, 'custom.bad-guc=1a')] from > pg_db_role_setting where setrole = 'aklaver'::regrole; Yeah, but this will require some parsing if I don't know what the value is. Of course, it's not impossible, I can: with x as ( select unnest(setconfig) as u from pg_db_role_setting where setrole = 'depesz'::regrole ) select regexp_replace(u, '^[^=]*=', '') from x where u like 'custom.bad-guc=%'; but I find it curious that I can set the guc using normal-ish SET, but can't get it using SHOW or even select current_setting() depesz
On 2/9/21 7:45 AM, hubert depesz lubaczewski wrote: > On Tue, Feb 09, 2021 at 07:41:02AM -0800, Adrian Klaver wrote: >> The only way I found so far is: >> select setconfig[array_position(setconfig, 'custom.bad-guc=1a')] from >> pg_db_role_setting where setrole = 'aklaver'::regrole; > > Yeah, but this will require some parsing if I don't know what the value > is. > Of course, it's not impossible, I can: > with x as ( > select unnest(setconfig) as u > from pg_db_role_setting > where setrole = 'depesz'::regrole > ) > select regexp_replace(u, '^[^=]*=', '') from x where u like 'custom.bad-guc=%'; > > but I find it curious that I can set the guc using normal-ish SET, but > can't get it using SHOW or even select current_setting() Yeah, I think that part is a bug report. > > depesz > -- Adrian Klaver adrian.klaver@aklaver.com
Adrian Klaver <adrian.klaver@aklaver.com> writes: > On 2/9/21 7:45 AM, hubert depesz lubaczewski wrote: >> but I find it curious that I can set the guc using normal-ish SET, but >> can't get it using SHOW or even select current_setting() > Yeah, I think that part is a bug report. After digging around in the code, I find the reason is that the entries in pg_db_role_setting.setconfig are parsed with ParseLongOption, which quoth: /* * A little "long argument" simulation, although not quite GNU * compliant. Takes a string of the form "some-option=some value" and * returns name = "some_option" and value = "some value" in malloc'ed * storage. Note that '-' is converted to '_' in the option name. If * there is no '=' in the input string then value will be NULL. */ Sure enough, regression=> show custom."bad-guc"; ERROR: unrecognized configuration parameter "custom.bad-guc" regression=> show custom."bad_guc"; custom.bad_guc ---------------- 1a (1 row) So that's where the setting went. There's a second problem here with arbitrary GUC names, which is that a name containing '=' isn't exactly gonna do what you want either. There are probably other places that are not terribly careful about funny characters in GUC names. In a quick test, I see that pg_dumpall seems to dump the ALTER USER SET safely, but I wouldn't want to bet that everything else copes. I think we should probably sanitize custom GUC names at least to the extent of forbidding '=' and '-'. Maybe we should go further and insist they look like regular identifiers. (Fortunately, ALTER USER SET with a custom GUC is superuser-only, so there's no need to worry about security issues here. But we should eliminate surprises.) regards, tom lane
> Sure enough, > regression=> show custom."bad-guc"; > ERROR: unrecognized configuration parameter "custom.bad-guc" > regression=> show custom."bad_guc"; > custom.bad_guc > ---------------- > 1a > (1 row) > So that's where the setting went. Oh, that's interesting. Unfortuantley it can also lead to problems: alter user depesz set custom.bad_guc='2b'; $ select * from pg_db_role_setting where setrole = 'depesz'::regrole; setdatabase │ setrole │ setconfig ─────────────┼─────────┼─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────── 0 │ 16384 │ {application_name=xxx,custom.guc=123,custom.bad-guc=1a,custom.bad_guc=2b} (1 row) And now I can get: $ show custom."bad_guc"; custom.bad_guc ──────────────── 2b (1 row) But the bad-guc is no longer available. > (Fortunately, ALTER USER SET with a custom GUC is superuser-only, > so there's no need to worry about security issues here. But we > should eliminate surprises.) Yeah. Realistically I wouldn't use variable names with - in them, but some people clearly are trying. Thanks, and best regards, depesz
On 2/9/21 9:00 AM, Tom Lane wrote: > Adrian Klaver <adrian.klaver@aklaver.com> writes: >> On 2/9/21 7:45 AM, hubert depesz lubaczewski wrote: >>> but I find it curious that I can set the guc using normal-ish SET, but >>> can't get it using SHOW or even select current_setting() > >> Yeah, I think that part is a bug report. > > After digging around in the code, I find the reason is that the entries in > pg_db_role_setting.setconfig are parsed with ParseLongOption, which quoth: > > /* > * A little "long argument" simulation, although not quite GNU > * compliant. Takes a string of the form "some-option=some value" and > * returns name = "some_option" and value = "some value" in malloc'ed > * storage. Note that '-' is converted to '_' in the option name. If > * there is no '=' in the input string then value will be NULL. > */ > > Sure enough, > > regression=> show custom."bad-guc"; > ERROR: unrecognized configuration parameter "custom.bad-guc" > regression=> show custom."bad_guc"; > custom.bad_guc > ---------------- > 1a > (1 row) > > So that's where the setting went. > > There's a second problem here with arbitrary GUC names, which is that > a name containing '=' isn't exactly gonna do what you want either. > > There are probably other places that are not terribly careful about > funny characters in GUC names. In a quick test, I see that pg_dumpall > seems to dump the ALTER USER SET safely, but I wouldn't want to bet > that everything else copes. > > I think we should probably sanitize custom GUC names at least to the > extent of forbidding '=' and '-'. Maybe we should go further and > insist they look like regular identifiers. > > (Fortunately, ALTER USER SET with a custom GUC is superuser-only, > so there's no need to worry about security issues here. But we > should eliminate surprises.) Hmm, further food for thought: test(5432)=# alter user aklaver reset custom."bad_guc" ; ALTER ROLE test(5432)=# select setconfig from pg_db_role_setting where setrole = 'aklaver'::regrole; setconfig --------------------- {custom.bad-guc=1a} (1 row) test(5432)=# alter user aklaver reset custom."bad-guc" ; ALTER ROLE test(5432)=# select setconfig from pg_db_role_setting where setrole = 'aklaver'::regrole; setconfig ----------- (0 rows) > > regards, tom lane > -- Adrian Klaver adrian.klaver@aklaver.com