Thread: The mysterious pg_proc.protrftypes

The mysterious pg_proc.protrftypes

From
"Joel Jacobson"
Date:
Hi,

I'm trying to understand how pg_proc.protrftypes works.

The documentation says "Data type OIDs for which to apply transforms.".
For this column, there is no reference to any catalog table?
I would guess it should be "(references pg_type.oid)", right?

I tried to generate a value for this column to verify my hypothesis,
but I struggle to find an example that produces a not null value here.

I grepped the sources and found the "CREATE TRANSFORM FOR type_name" command,
and found an extension using it named "bool_plperl" which I installed.

I assumed this would cause a value, but no.

Both of bool_plperl's two functions get null pg_proc.protrftypes values.

I've tried running the full regression "make installcheck", but protrftypes doesn't seem to be covered:

$ cd postgresql
$ make installcheck
...
=======================
All 203 tests passed.
=======================
$ psql regression
regression=# SELECT COUNT(*) FROM pg_proc WHERE protrftypes IS NOT NULL;
count
-------
     0
(1 row)

Can someone please show me how to generate a function with a not null pg_proc.protrftypes value?

Many thanks.

/Joel






Re: The mysterious pg_proc.protrftypes

From
Pavel Stehule
Date:


po 25. 1. 2021 v 8:05 odesílatel Joel Jacobson <joel@compiler.org> napsal:
Hi,

I'm trying to understand how pg_proc.protrftypes works.

The documentation says "Data type OIDs for which to apply transforms.".
For this column, there is no reference to any catalog table?
I would guess it should be "(references pg_type.oid)", right?

I tried to generate a value for this column to verify my hypothesis,
but I struggle to find an example that produces a not null value here.

I grepped the sources and found the "CREATE TRANSFORM FOR type_name" command,
and found an extension using it named "bool_plperl" which I installed.

I assumed this would cause a value, but no.

Both of bool_plperl's two functions get null pg_proc.protrftypes values.

I've tried running the full regression "make installcheck", but protrftypes doesn't seem to be covered:

$ cd postgresql
$ make installcheck
...
=======================
All 203 tests passed.
=======================
$ psql regression
regression=# SELECT COUNT(*) FROM pg_proc WHERE protrftypes IS NOT NULL;
count
-------
     0
(1 row)

Can someone please show me how to generate a function with a not null pg_proc.protrftypes value?

you should to use TRANSFORM clause in CREATE FUNCTION statement


CREATE EXTENSION hstore_plperl CASCADE;

CREATE FUNCTION test2() RETURNS hstore
LANGUAGE plperl
TRANSFORM FOR TYPE hstore
AS $$
$val = {a => 1, b => 'boo', c => undef};
return $val;
$$;

Regards

Pavel


Many thanks.

/Joel






Re: The mysterious pg_proc.protrftypes

From
"Joel Jacobson"
Date:
On Mon, Jan 25, 2021, at 08:14, Pavel Stehule wrote:
>you should to use TRANSFORM clause in CREATE FUNCTION statement

Thanks, it worked, and like expected it references the pg_type.oid of the transform.

Attached patch adds "(references pg_type.oid)" to the documentation for pg_proc.protrftypes.

Suggested commit message: "Document the fact that pg_proc.protrftypes references pg_type.oid"

/Joel
Attachment

Re: The mysterious pg_proc.protrftypes

From
Pavel Stehule
Date:


po 25. 1. 2021 v 8:47 odesílatel Joel Jacobson <joel@compiler.org> napsal:
On Mon, Jan 25, 2021, at 08:14, Pavel Stehule wrote:
>you should to use TRANSFORM clause in CREATE FUNCTION statement

Thanks, it worked, and like expected it references the pg_type.oid of the transform.

Attached patch adds "(references pg_type.oid)" to the documentation for pg_proc.protrftypes.

Suggested commit message: "Document the fact that pg_proc.protrftypes references pg_type.oid"

+1

Pavel


/Joel

Re: The mysterious pg_proc.protrftypes

From
Tom Lane
Date:
"Joel Jacobson" <joel@compiler.org> writes:
> Attached patch adds "(references pg_type.oid)" to the documentation for pg_proc.protrftypes.

Agreed, pushed.  I also stumbled over a backend core dump while
testing it :-(.  So this whole area seems a bit spongy ...

            regards, tom lane