Thread: small cleanup in unicode_norm.c

small cleanup in unicode_norm.c

From
John Naylor
Date:
We've had get_canonical_class() for a while as a backend-only function. There is some ad-hoc code elsewhere that implements the same logic in a couple places, so it makes sense for all sites to use this function instead, as in the attached.

--
John Naylor
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company 
Attachment

Re: small cleanup in unicode_norm.c

From
Michael Paquier
Date:
On Mon, Dec 07, 2020 at 03:24:56PM -0400, John Naylor wrote:
> We've had get_canonical_class() for a while as a backend-only function.
> There is some ad-hoc code elsewhere that implements the same logic in a
> couple places, so it makes sense for all sites to use this function
> instead, as in the attached.

Thanks John for caring about that.  This is a nice simplification, and
it looks fine to me.

-static uint8
-get_canonical_class(pg_wchar ch)
-{
Two nits here.  I would use "code" for the name of the argument for
consistency with get_code_entry(), and add a description at the top of
this helper routine (say a simple "get the combining class of given
code").  Anything else you can think of?
--
Michael

Attachment

Re: small cleanup in unicode_norm.c

From
John Naylor
Date:

On Tue, Dec 8, 2020 at 5:45 AM Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Dec 07, 2020 at 03:24:56PM -0400, John Naylor wrote:
> > We've had get_canonical_class() for a while as a backend-only function.
> > There is some ad-hoc code elsewhere that implements the same logic in a
> > couple places, so it makes sense for all sites to use this function
> > instead, as in the attached.
>
> Thanks John for caring about that.  This is a nice simplification, and
> it looks fine to me.
>
> -static uint8
> -get_canonical_class(pg_wchar ch)
> -{
> Two nits here.  I would use "code" for the name of the argument for
> consistency with get_code_entry(), and add a description at the top of
> this helper routine (say a simple "get the combining class of given
> code").  Anything else you can think of?

Thanks for taking a look. Sounds good, I've made those adjustments and wrote a commit message. I took another look and didn't see anything else to address.

--
John Naylor
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
Attachment

Re: small cleanup in unicode_norm.c

From
Michael Paquier
Date:
On Tue, Dec 08, 2020 at 02:25:43PM -0400, John Naylor wrote:
> Thanks for taking a look. Sounds good, I've made those adjustments and
> wrote a commit message. I took another look and didn't see anything else to
> address.

Looks good to me, so applied.
--
Michael

Attachment