Thread: 回复: Re: A documents mistaken of PG12.5
Hi Heikki,
Thank you very much.You are right.
I think I'm confusing the two syntax.
I think I need a deeper understanding and operation.
祝工作顺利!
-------------------------------------------
邱臣君
瀚高基础软件股份有限公司
地址:济南市高新区新泺大街2117号铭盛大厦20层
手机:186-6081-2363 邮箱:qiuchenjun@highgo.com
On 30/11/2020 04:50, qiuchenjun@highgo.com wrote:> Hello,>> I found the mistaken in the PG12.5,chapter 4.1.2.2> whereas in chapter 4.1.1>> I think 6-digit is right.It seems correct to me as it is. Chapter 4.1.1 talks about this syntax:postgres=# select U&'d\0061t\+000061';?column?----------data(1 row)Whereas chapter 4.1.2.2 talks about this syntax:postgres=# select E'd\u0061t\U00000061';?column?----------data(1 row)The former indeed uses 6 digits, whereas the latter uses 8 digits.- Heikki