Thread: List reclassification

List reclassification

From
Magnus Hagander
Date:
Per some off-list (...) discussion, it was noted that both pgsql-bugs
and pgsql-docs are listed as "user lists" in our systems, and not
"developer lists":

I'd say at least bugs should definitely be considered a developer
list, and given how it's used probably also docs?

If there are no objections, I'm going to go ahead and move those two
lists over to "developer lists".

-- 
 Magnus Hagander
 Me: https://www.hagander.net/
 Work: https://www.redpill-linpro.com/



Re: List reclassification

From
Daniel Gustafsson
Date:
> On 3 Nov 2020, at 10:55, Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net> wrote:

> I'd say at least bugs should definitely be considered a developer
> list, and given how it's used probably also docs?

+1 for moving both -bugs and -docs to be classified as developer lists.

cheers ./daniel



Re: List reclassification

From
Alvaro Herrera
Date:
On 2020-Nov-03, Daniel Gustafsson wrote:

> > On 3 Nov 2020, at 10:55, Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net> wrote:
> 
> > I'd say at least bugs should definitely be considered a developer
> > list, and given how it's used probably also docs?
> 
> +1 for moving both -bugs and -docs to be classified as developer lists.

Another +1 to both



Re: List reclassification

From
"Jonathan S. Katz"
Date:
On 11/3/20 9:00 AM, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> On 2020-Nov-03, Daniel Gustafsson wrote:
>
>>> On 3 Nov 2020, at 10:55, Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net> wrote:
>>
>>> I'd say at least bugs should definitely be considered a developer
>>> list, and given how it's used probably also docs?
>>
>> +1 for moving both -bugs and -docs to be classified as developer lists.
>
> Another +1 to both

+1.

Jonathan


Attachment

Re: List reclassification

From
Magnus Hagander
Date:
On Tue, Nov 3, 2020 at 3:51 PM Jonathan S. Katz <jkatz@postgresql.org> wrote:
>
> On 11/3/20 9:00 AM, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> > On 2020-Nov-03, Daniel Gustafsson wrote:
> >
> >>> On 3 Nov 2020, at 10:55, Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net> wrote:
> >>
> >>> I'd say at least bugs should definitely be considered a developer
> >>> list, and given how it's used probably also docs?
> >>
> >> +1 for moving both -bugs and -docs to be classified as developer lists.
> >
> > Another +1 to both
>
> +1.

I guess +3 should be enough :) I've implemented this change -- it will
take some time before it propagates to all the different systems and
show up.

-- 
 Magnus Hagander
 Me: https://www.hagander.net/
 Work: https://www.redpill-linpro.com/