Thread: [PATCH]Fix ja.po error
Hi,hackers
When I was using PostgresQL, I noticed that the output of the Japanese messages was inconsistent with the English messages.
The Japanese message needs to be modified,so I made the patch.
See the attachment for the patch.
Best regards
Attachment
On Wed, Jul 29, 2020 at 08:42:27AM +0000, Lu, Chenyang wrote: > When I was using PostgreSQL, I noticed that the output of the > Japanese messages was inconsistent with the English messages. > The Japanese message needs to be modified,so I made the patch. Indeed, good catch. This needs to be applied to the translation repository first though: https://git.postgresql.org/gitweb/?p=pgtranslation/messages.git;a=summary I am adding Alvaro and Peter in CC as they take care of that usually (I don't think I have an access to this repo). -- Michael
Attachment
Ping: sorry, did Alvaro and Peter forget this email?( Maybe didn't see this email~ ), I found that the patch of ja.po hasnot been applied to the Translation Repository. -----Original Message----- From: Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz> Sent: Wednesday, July 29, 2020 5:25 PM To: Lu, Chenyang/陆 晨阳 <lucy.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com> Cc: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org; alvherre@2ndquadrant.com; peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com Subject: Re: [PATCH]Fix ja.po error On Wed, Jul 29, 2020 at 08:42:27AM +0000, Lu, Chenyang wrote: > When I was using PostgreSQL, I noticed that the output of the Japanese > messages was inconsistent with the English messages. > The Japanese message needs to be modified,so I made the patch. Indeed, good catch. This needs to be applied to the translation repository first though: https://git.postgresql.org/gitweb/?p=pgtranslation/messages.git;a=summary I am adding Alvaro and Peter in CC as they take care of that usually (I don't think I have an access to this repo). -- Michael
On 2020-Aug-19, Lu, Chenyang wrote: > Ping: sorry, did Alvaro and Peter forget this email?( Maybe didn't see this email~ ), I found that the patch of ja.po hasnot been applied to the Translation Repository. Apologies. I have pushed this to all branches of the translation repo now. The bogus 'msgstr' was not identical in Postgres 11 and back -- I think the only difference was one extra whitespace. I suppose that's not important, so I used the translation as provided with no change. -- Álvaro Herrera https://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services