Thread: Convert hot_standby 9.4 postgresql into standalone server

Convert hot_standby 9.4 postgresql into standalone server

From
Julie Nishimura
Date:
Hello, we currently have 9.4 hot_standby master-slave pair. Going forward, we can keep only one server. How can I convert the system properly?

These are some snippets from master postgresql.conf file:

==================================
wal_level = hot_standby                 # minimal, archive, hot_standby, or logical
                                        # (change requires restart)
                                        checkpoint_segments = 16
wal_keep_segments = 512
max_wal_senders = 16            # max number of walsender processes
                                # (change requires restart)
max_replication_slots = 12      # max number of replication slots
===================================

Is it enough if I do the following:
1) backup all dbs on master
2) shutdown both servers
3) update max_replication_slots=0 in postgresql.conf on master
4) update wal_level = minimal in postgresql.conf on master
4) start master

Do I need to do anything else? Thank you for your help

Re: Convert hot_standby 9.4 postgresql into standalone server

From
"David G. Johnston"
Date:
On Tuesday, July 14, 2020, Julie Nishimura <juliezain@hotmail.com> wrote:
Hello, we currently have 9.4 hot_standby master-slave pair. Going forward, we can keep only one server. How can I convert the system properly?

If you are keeping the primary you shouldn’t have to do anything.  The absence of a secondary server shouldn’t impact the primary.  You might be recording more detail to WAL than strictly necessary but that isn’t wrong outright.

David J.

Re: Convert hot_standby 9.4 postgresql into standalone server

From
Tom Lane
Date:
"David G. Johnston" <david.g.johnston@gmail.com> writes:
> On Tuesday, July 14, 2020, Julie Nishimura <juliezain@hotmail.com> wrote:
>> Hello, we currently have 9.4 hot_standby master-slave pair. Going forward,
>> we can keep only one server. How can I convert the system properly?

> If you are keeping the primary you shouldn’t have to do anything.  The
> absence of a secondary server shouldn’t impact the primary.  You might be
> recording more detail to WAL than strictly necessary but that isn’t wrong
> outright.

Yeah.  What you *do* need to think about is, if you no longer have
a standby server, what's your disaster recovery plan in case the
primary fails?  You need to have some good backup procedures in place.

            regards, tom lane